Paris Hilton Needs A Pooper Scooper
Or more likely a shovel, considering how deep in the doodoo she's gotten this time.
It seems that she announced to a shocked Ellen DeGeneres that she has seventeen--yes seventeen--dogs. Here's a snippet:
Ellen: Seventeen? Why do you have so many dogs?Paris: Cuz they keep having babies, and I feel bad to give them away, because I feel like if I had a baby and someone gave it away it would be mean, so I feel bad for my dogs.
Ellen:Â Paris, you have to spay and neuter your pets.
Paris:Â They all just got fixed.
Ellen:Â All of 'em?
Paris:Â (pause) (unconvincingly) Yes.
Ellen: No. You're lying again!
Paris:Â Two--two of them weren't.
Â
Paris also got in trouble recently because she supposedly abandoned a cat at a vet's office. She adopted the kitty before she went in the pokey, and was supposed to get it fixed immediately. Apparently, to Paris, "immediately" translates to "whenever I get around to it," because she just "got around to it" in January:
TMZ has learned that Miss P adopted the puddy tat — which she named Prada — at the Kris Kelly Foundation last May, about a week before she headed to Lynwood Jail. After Paris was released, we're told she knew she had to have Prada neutered, but didn't get around to it until a few weeks ago, on January 30.But here's the problem — nobody came back for Prada! About a week later, Kris Kelly herself called Paris to find out what happened, but she still hasn't heard back as to what to do with Paris' pussy.
Paris' people say this is nothing to meow about. The cat was to be dropped off to be neutered and then delivered to one of Paris' peeps. That apparently hasn't happened yet. But Kris tells us that it's "a clear-cut case of abandonment" (no pun intended, we think) and has decided not to return the cat.
I'm so mad about this. Paris has demonstrated yet again that she is incapable of caring for anything and anyone other than herself. What the crap is this about how if she had a baby she'd feel bad if someone took it from her, and so that's why she justified keeping the babies produced by her animals?
First of all, God forbid this woman should reproduce a live human being. And second, it isn't cruel to give away baby animals once a sufficient time frame has passed. Animals know that there is a time when baby animals no longer need their mothers, and they actively work to get that baby animal out of the "nest" and out into the world. I've seen it happen with cats, dogs, birds...after a while, it's perfectly okay. It's what is supposed to happen. It's natural. How does Paris think she got her original animals, if they weren't separated from their mother?
Continued on the next page
Follow Technorati