Moon Transparency
While the bankers are getting reamed out by the public for not being transparent, N.A.S.A. has spent $79 million dollars to hurl and impact the moon. The transparency for N.A.S.A. is that they are trying to discover water on the moon. In the world of “fair”, India already beat the N.A.S.A. team to that positive conclusion.
What is with trying to get the moon colonized? Are things (finally) so screwed up here on Earth, that it is necessary for the entire planet to evacuate?
The moon is much smaller then the Earth and has no ecosystem, or bio-diversity, like the Earth. This begs a question of who would be eligible for colonizing the moon?
Let’s not forget, as the web has pointed out and most people have the knowledge, that the moon has effects on the planet. The organic body is 70% water; thus having effects on individuals.
With the admission, from N.A.S.A., water is more valuable than gold, does that mean the water supply should be cleaned up? The expense of $79 million dollars would have been better used in an effort to protect that resource.
Transparency has been in public demand since the economic downturn, and the rally cries are still ignored. When will the transparency ever reach the little guy?
Follow Technorati